CNN Priorities

Having seen this:[[image:cnn.jpg:Finger next to the pulse:center:0]]I sent the following to CNN:

We are actively waging war in Iraq, with thousands of US soldiers putting their lives on the line *right now* in Falluja, and the website’s top story is that some guy who may have killed his wife is about to be sentenced. Really? That’s honestly the most important thing going on? The murder of one spouse (or boy/girlfriend) by another is something that happens on average 3 or 4 times per day in the US, whereas we rarely get more than 1 or 2 wars per day, but the top story is a rather unpleasant example of the sadly routine, rather than a battle that could help determine the security of the entire Middle East (and 300 million people here)?

Ripped from the Headlines

A school in New Jersey was accidentally strafed with 25 inactive rounds from a Air National Guard plane last week. CNN’s headline on the fallout:

Residents: School strafing ‘unacceptable’

That’s a bit harsh – I’m sure the Air National Guard was looking for a ‘negotiable’ at the very least.

Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged with

Fun with numbers

Peggy Noonan, famed for suggesting that Gore was mentally unstable when he sighed too loudly during the 2000 debate (but strangely didn’t say anything when Bush said “Let me finish” in the first 2004 debate when nobody was trying to stop him), writes

Let us get our heads around the size and scope of what happened Tuesday. George W. Bush, 43rd president of the United States, became the first incumbent president to increase his majority in both the Senate and the House and to increase his own vote (by over 3.5 million) since Franklin D. Roosevelt, political genius of the 20th century, in 1936. This is huge.

George W. Bush is the first president to win more than 50% of the popular vote since 1988. (Bill Clinton failed to twice; Mr. Bush failed to last time and fell short of a plurality by half a million.) The president received more than 59 million votes, breaking Ronald Reagan’s old record of 54.5 million. Mr. Bush increased his personal percentages in almost every state in the union. He carried the Catholic vote and won 42% of the Hispanic vote and 24% of the Jewish vote (up from 19% in 2000.)

It will be hard for the mainstream media to continue, in the face of these facts, the mantra that we are a deeply and completely divided country. But they’ll try!

Now I’m not going to cry foul on any attempt to portray Bush as the winner because, you know, he like, won, and stuff. But let’s look at three factors that Ms Noonan glosses over:

  • FDR’s share of vote: 60.8%. Bush’s: 51.4% (lowest of any incumbent president since FDR)
  • Increase in population since Reagan’s victory: 24%. Increase in vote: 9.5%
  • Number of times the winner of the electoral college has lost the popular vote: 4 (1824, 1876, 1888, 2000).

There have been many closer elections in the popular vote, but 51% to 48% is hardly a blow-out. A lot of people voted for him, but not a meaningful record really. And to have won at all he almost had to improve his previous results.

A solid result then, and the Republican gains he led in Congress in 2002 and 2004 are striking, but nothing about it suggests that the country isn’t polarized; the divide is merely a little further to the right than before.

Update: Here’s a more thorough accounting.

Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged with

Netflix, why did I forsake thee?

For tactical reasons unimportant here I just signed up for Blockbuster’s DVD delivery service. So far the service is slow, the website unimpressive, and availability limited. But I am getting a free copy of Shrek 2. Once the month is up I think I’ll go back to Netflix, which is just better. In the meantime here’s an example of where Blockbuster go wrong…

I wanted to sign up for their email newsletter, to find out about upcoming releases. Already logged in to their site, I followed the appropriate link and was asked for my postal address. Not my email address, my meatspace one. Rather than supply this again, I wrote to customer support:

Why do I have to give you my address (that you already know anyway) to sign up for the electronic newsletters? Are you expecting to deliver the electrons via USPS?

Their reply?

Thank you for contacting Blockbuster Online Customer Service. My apologies for the delay in response to your e-mail. Recently we have been experiencing an unusually high number of e-mails, which has been affecting response times. It is necessary to make sure information is being issued to the correct individual.

.I immediately retorted with:

You’re saying that you are willing to ship me valuable DVDs without checking who I am, but you can’t send me essentially worthless email without having my address twice? That doesn’t sound at all sensible.

I shall update this thread when I get a new answer, as I’m sure all both of you are waiting with keen anticipation for a resolution.

Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged with