Fuel Tax

The Chancellor, Gordon Brown, has come out with a pre-Budget report. I’ve lost track of the details of how budgets work now, but basically he announces some things now, then does a bigger announcement in April (that’s the one that usually contains tax changes).

One of the things he’s announced is a rise of 1.25 pence per litre on petrol. This is the first increase in 3 years, partly because of the general rise in oil prices, but also due to a civilized revolt by car owners. As this is about the largest ‘green’ tax in the country, that means that green taxes overall have dropped compared to 2003. That, it seems clear, is a bad thing. All taxes act as a punishment, whatever their other virtues, and currently we get much more of our revenue by punishing work, savings or even spending than we do by punishing things we actually want to punish.

Personally I’d like to remove all taxes from driving except for those on fuel. Too much of the cost of using cars is hidden by the large fixed cost of owning them, so a trip that might actually cost £100 including its share of those costs appears to only cost £25 of petrol. If the costs were placed on individual acts of consumption it would prompt people to think more carefully about every trip, without necessarily costing drivers as a whole any more than the current system.

Another in the long list of things I’ll sort out when someone makes me Emperor.

Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged with ,

Indifference

A new report from Unicef shows that over 1.5 million children a year die because of unclean water. That’s around 1 every 20 seconds. A 9/11 every 16 hours. Around the same rate as the Holocaust.

We know how to make water clean. We even know how to make it clean cheaply in most cases, in fact so cheap that we flush gallons of the stuff away without a second thought. Yes it gets harder in deserts, remote locations and countries that lack all sorts of basic infrastructure, but none of it is beyond the wit of man. No, there are only two things that stop us from fixing this before the year is out:

1. The cruelty of the people in charge of many of these regions, who would rather consolidate their power than help ordinary people.
2. Our indifference (and I do mean ‘our’, yours and mine).

We can’t do anything about the first one today. But the second we can. So go make a donation today. You could do it directly, via someone like PlanUSA. If you prefer a more long-term, ‘teach a man to fish’ approach find someone who provides microcredit. Or just go to an Oxfam site and donate, and let them do the thinking. I’m trying to find a suitable organization to give to in the UK (so they can get a tax credit on my donation) – once I do I’ll give them a fiver. That will literally make no difference to me, but could save a child’s life. Imagine that.

Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged with

Earmarks

Via Ezra, here’s a gmap-mashup of earmarks from a single appropriations bill. Ezra makes the point that actually these aren’t bad (certainly the ones for Minneapolis seem broadly admirable things), but I’m still uncomfortable with such things; if you really want to dish money out to (relatively) small projects lets set up a largesse board for each state that can weigh the various applications publicly, rather than leaving themselves wide open to the appearance of abuse. I’m being nice by putting the word appearance in there.

Anyway, both Ezra and I have projects in our neighborhoods (ex, in my case) for “a naturally occurring retirement communities demonstration project”. This may be a perfectly decent and good thing, but you have to admit it sounds odd. If you have to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars for them, you can hardly call them ‘naturally occurring’ can you?

‘Fair’ Tax

My friend Marty has put up another post about the so-called Fair Tax. I have some sympathy with the idea, but also a great many issues with it, but I wanted to pick up on a couple of criticisms here, based on this paragraph:

Do I need a paragraph here to refute the idea that savings are bad for the economy? I hope not but here’s the summary. Capital is to a large part those things people use to be productive, buildings to work in, computers to work on, tractors for a farmer, trucks for a delivery company etc. Greater capital investment makes workers more productive. The more productive the worker the better he gets paid and the more cheaply his company can sell the good or service it produces. In order to build capital people must invest money in capital equipment. In order [to] invest money people must first save money. What drives the economy is not spending but saving. Or as someone else put it, “Savings fuels growth, entrepreneurship drives it.”

Now Marty is a sceptic about a great many things, including evolution and global warming. Given his doubts over such theories, it’s interesting that he can state “The more productive the worker the better he gets paid”, which is clearly a theory, and one that in the stated form is currently being disproved (since 2000 productivity has gone up more than inflation, whereas after inflation wages have dropped). Now it’s perhaps fair to say that “The more productive the worker the better his chance of increased pay”, but even that’s a theory not a fact.

The second issue I find even more strange. “In order [to] invest money people must first save money” is a very linear statement; first save, then invest, then boost growth, etc. In practice this is part of a cycle; yes you have to save to invest, but you can’t just decide to save, you have to have something to save. And the only ways to do that are to already have the something to save, or to generate it. Either way, at some point you must have sold something, which means somebody had to spend. Hence, I could argue, spending drives the economy.

Of course I’d be wrong. Spending can drive the economy, but only to a certain point before investment is required, which requires saving. Saving can drive the economy, but only to a certain point before that saving requires a return, which depends on spending. All the ideas for jump-starting the economy, whether it’s trickle-down, pump-priming or whatever, rely on the this elasticity; you can mess with one for a while, and hope that you’ve messed in a way that will cause the others to catch up before your purse runs dry, because there is no start to the wheel.

Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged with

Boosterism

My friend Josh has a new job, and to make sure he can retire on his options this decade I’ll give him a quick mention. Jellyfish lets you earn cashback on purchases. Simple as that really. Normally I’d wonder at a scheme like this, but if Josh is involved then that gives me some confidence that it’s legit. Oh, and of course the link gives me a little boost too 🙂

Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged with